<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Warp Alert: Browser Wars Are Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.utest.com/time-warp-alert-browser-wars-are-back/2010/06/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.utest.com/time-warp-alert-browser-wars-are-back/2010/06/</link>
	<description>Software Testing Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanton Champion</title>
		<link>http://blog.utest.com/time-warp-alert-browser-wars-are-back/2010/06/comment-page-1/#comment-15889</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanton Champion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.utest.com/?p=6257#comment-15889</guid>
		<description>Rick - I agree with you that Firefox has the most mature extensions library, but it&#039;s also been around the longest.  Chrome&#039;s extensions are immature, but they should get better.

I&#039;ve been using Chrome for a while now, and I do find it faster and more stable than Firefox.  However, I never found Firefox to be all that bad to begin with.  Chrome is better, but Firefox was still decent.  

Chrome has some nice usability improvements that I like.  The tab bar is cleaner and the browser feels simpler. Of course, it&#039;s a usability trick.  Reduce clutter in your application and it will feel faster.

On the other hand, I do miss a few things about Firefox.  I loved the Awesome Bar (yeah, I said it).  I keep trying to navigate using the Chrome URL bar and it just doesn&#039;t compare.  I&#039;m also used to how Gecko renders pages, and WebKit has some idiosyncrasies I haven&#039;t quite gotten used to.  

On the whole, I thing both browsers are strong. I use both daily, and I think both bring unique things to the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick &#8211; I agree with you that Firefox has the most mature extensions library, but it&#8217;s also been around the longest.  Chrome&#8217;s extensions are immature, but they should get better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using Chrome for a while now, and I do find it faster and more stable than Firefox.  However, I never found Firefox to be all that bad to begin with.  Chrome is better, but Firefox was still decent.  </p>
<p>Chrome has some nice usability improvements that I like.  The tab bar is cleaner and the browser feels simpler. Of course, it&#8217;s a usability trick.  Reduce clutter in your application and it will feel faster.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I do miss a few things about Firefox.  I loved the Awesome Bar (yeah, I said it).  I keep trying to navigate using the Chrome URL bar and it just doesn&#8217;t compare.  I&#8217;m also used to how Gecko renders pages, and WebKit has some idiosyncrasies I haven&#8217;t quite gotten used to.  </p>
<p>On the whole, I thing both browsers are strong. I use both daily, and I think both bring unique things to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickRussellTX</title>
		<link>http://blog.utest.com/time-warp-alert-browser-wars-are-back/2010/06/comment-page-1/#comment-15879</link>
		<dc:creator>RickRussellTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 03:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.utest.com/?p=6257#comment-15879</guid>
		<description>--speed, ++extension management

You can talk speed all day long, but ultimately, if I&#039;m loading less crap than you are, I don&#039;t need to be as fast. 

Stellar extensions for Firefox, like Adblock Plus, Flashblock and XMarks, make my browsing experience better than I can get on Chrome. 

There&#039;s an Adblock for Chrome, but Google -- an advertising supported company -- hasn&#039;t exposed enough API to actually block the loading of ads. So the extension goes back and &quot;covers them up&quot;. 

There&#039;s a fork of the open source components of Chrome (ChromePlus) that integrates ad blocking, and if I wasn&#039;t using Firefox I&#039;d probably use ChromePlus.

Although tabs are clearly the interface of choice right now, I see nothing essential about tabs -- for example, a selection tool for open pages that worked like Expose&#039; on the Mac could easily supplant tabs in the next major interation of browsers. 

My mom uses that new Safari &quot;top sites&quot; view as her primary navigator -- she was beside herself when she accidentally changed something and lost it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211;speed, ++extension management</p>
<p>You can talk speed all day long, but ultimately, if I&#8217;m loading less crap than you are, I don&#8217;t need to be as fast. </p>
<p>Stellar extensions for Firefox, like Adblock Plus, Flashblock and XMarks, make my browsing experience better than I can get on Chrome. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s an Adblock for Chrome, but Google &#8212; an advertising supported company &#8212; hasn&#8217;t exposed enough API to actually block the loading of ads. So the extension goes back and &#8220;covers them up&#8221;. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a fork of the open source components of Chrome (ChromePlus) that integrates ad blocking, and if I wasn&#8217;t using Firefox I&#8217;d probably use ChromePlus.</p>
<p>Although tabs are clearly the interface of choice right now, I see nothing essential about tabs &#8212; for example, a selection tool for open pages that worked like Expose&#8217; on the Mac could easily supplant tabs in the next major interation of browsers. </p>
<p>My mom uses that new Safari &#8220;top sites&#8221; view as her primary navigator &#8212; she was beside herself when she accidentally changed something and lost it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

