<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Danger in the Clouds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.utest.com/danger-in-the-clouds/2009/10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.utest.com/danger-in-the-clouds/2009/10/</link>
	<description>Software Testing Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanton Champion</title>
		<link>http://blog.utest.com/danger-in-the-clouds/2009/10/comment-page-1/#comment-14549</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanton Champion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.utest.com/?p=2091#comment-14549</guid>
		<description>Randall - Back in the day, the cloud storage feature was probably a cheap way to make the Sidekick a smarter phone than it actually was.  

As storage prices dropped, I suspect it became a handy way to keep customers locked-in to the phone.  You could upgrade to a new Sidekick pretty easily, but buying a competitor would require you to start over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randall &#8211; Back in the day, the cloud storage feature was probably a cheap way to make the Sidekick a smarter phone than it actually was.  </p>
<p>As storage prices dropped, I suspect it became a handy way to keep customers locked-in to the phone.  You could upgrade to a new Sidekick pretty easily, but buying a competitor would require you to start over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall Kasper</title>
		<link>http://blog.utest.com/danger-in-the-clouds/2009/10/comment-page-1/#comment-14548</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Kasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.utest.com/?p=2091#comment-14548</guid>
		<description>Other best practices you have missed?  How about not using a device that doesn&#039;t store anything locally??  Storage is so unbelievably inexpensive these days that there is no reason for a mobile device to not have the capability of storing all content on the device itself, or at the very least a large capacity memory card.

Other than that, anyone not doing any kind of regular  full backups is a fool (yes, even you Microsoft!  Apparently they had a Hitachi SAN upgrade failure AND NO WORKING BACKUP OF THE DATA!!!)  And never trust a single site for backup purposes,  use a a desktop manager or intellisync application to back your stuff up onto your desktop/laptop.

The level of Microsoft&#039;s latest fumble absolutely boggles my mind!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other best practices you have missed?  How about not using a device that doesn&#8217;t store anything locally??  Storage is so unbelievably inexpensive these days that there is no reason for a mobile device to not have the capability of storing all content on the device itself, or at the very least a large capacity memory card.</p>
<p>Other than that, anyone not doing any kind of regular  full backups is a fool (yes, even you Microsoft!  Apparently they had a Hitachi SAN upgrade failure AND NO WORKING BACKUP OF THE DATA!!!)  And never trust a single site for backup purposes,  use a a desktop manager or intellisync application to back your stuff up onto your desktop/laptop.</p>
<p>The level of Microsoft&#8217;s latest fumble absolutely boggles my mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

