Android Screen Mirroring Tool Showdown: Which App is Your Go-to?

Video captured by testers is an integral piece of the puzzle for developers; faster understanding of the problem youmobizen‘re encountering means faster identification the root issue to enact the necessary changes.

If you’ve ever tried to find a screen-mirroring tool for Android, you’ve likely waded through dozens of applications that at first seem like solid solutions, before ending in headaches and time wasted on confusing setup steps. Some even require your device to be rooted, which is no use if you’re participating in testing that prohibits using modified devices!

If only there were a simple way to project what you see on your Android device’s screen to a computer monitor! Alas, there are indeed a few tools you can start using today, but which is the best?

  • Some testers have praised Droid@Screen for its intuitive, user-friendly interface while others down-rate its ability to stream video at a usable rate and its lack of an in-app video recorder.
  • How about Mobizen? Touted as easy to install with good frame rates, yet the input method changes for different applications, resulting in some user confusion.
  • MyMobiler is the go-to for some uTesters, who enjoy its wireless connection and keyboard control during recording but have experienced periodic disconnection problems.
  • Heard of AndroidScreenCast? Some features of the app require your device to be rooted, so do the pros outweigh the cons?

Hop on over to our Tool Reviews section and check em’ out, then tell us what you think! Have any better suggestions for Android screen mirroring apps? Submit them to our Tool Reviews repository and share your hard-earned knowledge.

So who wins the Android screen mirroring tool showdown? Leave a comment below and let’s discuss!

Load Testing Tool LoadStorm Introduces LITE Version

Untitled5Creator of cloud testing tool LoadStorm, CustomerCentrix, today announced that it has released a LITE version of its cloud load testing tool.

This version is designed to be a cost-effective, easy-to-use complement to its enterprise level tool, LoadStorm PRO. According to the company, LoadStorm allows users to set up tests in the web application and run them from the cloud with no hardware to purchase and no software to install. Users will be able to try LITE for free from their site.

Don’t forget to leave a review of LoadStorm if you’ve used the cloud load testing tool in the past, and be sure to check out the complete library of testing Tool Reviews to check out comparable load testing tools and see which is best for your testing team’s needs.

Snagit for Windows Features Every Tester Needs to Know

I used TechSmith’s Snagit before I started working here. I was creating simple screen captures with annotations for my test documentation and reporting defects. The more I used Snagit, the more it became a part of my daily workflow. I discovered that many testers are doing just what I did — using Snagit for those simple screen capture tasks. But it’s far more powerful than that. And the robust features in Snagit are often overlooked because testers find lots of value in the capture experience alone.

To better understand the features that testers love most about Snagit, I turned to our testers here at TechSmith. Who better to give advice on Snagit features than the testers that help make it! Here are the top features of Snagit our testers use to make their work shine.

Video Capture

Video in Snagit? Yep, it’s in there, but you might be wondering why you would want to use it. It can be difficult to describe the complex behaviors of software solely through text. Capturing video of a defect or anomaly in action is a far more powerful demonstration. With video, you can describe the behavior prior to and following an anomaly. Essentially, you’re narrating the defect. And video is extremely helpful when working with remote testers or developers.

To capture a video, simply activate a capture and select the video button:


Continue Reading

New Testing Tools Added to uTest Include Those in Automation, Screen Mirroring

Thanks to our great community, over the past month at uTest, we’ve added more than 30 tools to our ever-expanding library of Software Testing Tools, including those in security, automation and even screen mirroring.

The Tool Reviews section of uTest is your one-stop shop to rate, review and discuss the tools that are supposed to make testers’ lives (hey, that’s you!) easier. Here’s just a small sampling of the tools being talked about by our community over the past 30 days:

Testomato Untitled13 Untitled16 TestFairy_MainUntitled12
uTest has designed Tool Reviews to be the place where testers can make educated decisions on the tools that may become a part of their daily routine, and to see which tools have won the hearts — or the ire — of their testing peers. If we’re ever missing your favorite test tool, be sure to submit it to us, and we’ll add it right away so you can leave the first review!

Three Essential Features for Test Management Products

Note: The following is a guest submission to the uTest Blog from Nicole Abrahams.

You don’t need us to explain to you the importance of working with a test management product that not only gets the job done, but is a pleasure to work with on an ongoing basis.checklist

Managing the software testing process is by no means glamorous work, and moving between different test procedures, although interesting, certainly isn’t the most exciting activity programmers ever get to do. But it’s an essential activity, and when you’re looking through all the test management products on the market today, it’s within your best interest to find one that not only looks great, but which displays the three essential features listed below.

Whether you’re an amateur tester or you’ve been working in this field for many years, three essential features you should look for (and ask about) before purchasing any test management software are:

Ease of Use

One feature you should look for in a test management product above all else is: How easy is the tool to use? It may sound obvious, but the easier a particular test management product is, the more inclined you will be to use it on a frequent basis, and the shorter the learning curve will be when moving over from another, similar tool.

Continue Reading

Top 10 Most Popular Testing Tools at uTest Include Jing and Firebug

Tools_clipartThe Tool Reviews section of the uTest Community is not only the testing world ‘App Store’ equivalent for its library of tool submissions and reviews, but a section of the site that tells a story. OK, so maybe it’s not a Disney-esque story filled with fairies and unicorns, but it is nonetheless a rich story of the tools that draw the most praise from…and ire of…our community of testers.

Here are the top 10 most reviewed tools at uTest Tool Reviews in the uTest Community based on the number of review submissions:

  1. Notepad++
  2. Jing
  3. AirDroid
  4. Firebug
  5. Reflector
  6. Snagit
  7. QuickMark
  8. Camtasia
  9. iPhone Configuration Utility
  10. Android Debug Bridge

Don’t see yours on the list? Be sure to add a review for your favorite testing tool today, or add the tool to our library if your peers have not!

Top Tweets of ‘Your Must-Have Testing Tools’ Include…A Hammer?

Our latest #TestingChatter challenge on Twitter asked for your tweets in response to the question: What are your must-have testing tools? Our uTesters delivered, and shared some of the tools that they use the most to get the job done. Here’s some of the top responses from the past week:

Continue Reading

Bug Tracking Testing Tool Showdown: Bugzilla Vs. JIRA

Our latest Testing Tool Showdown pits two popular bug tracking tools against each other: Bugzilla vs. JIRA.

Bugzilla is a free bug tracking option, and has garnered a 4-out-of-5 rating amongst the uTest Community in our Tool Reviews section of the site. Our testers have cited its ease of use in centralizing bugs, the fact that it’s 100% free, and its “good, stable support” as benchmarks of the high rating.

JIRA, on the other side of the ring, is a paid option, running at $10 per month for its basic issue tracking capabilities. While an incident management tool, it is commonly used for bug tracking as well in developer and tester teams. Our testers especially love its ecosystem of plugins and intuitiveness, despite the steep initial administration curve.

But if we were really concerned about each tools’ individual performance, this wouldn’t be a showdown, would it? If you were to pit these two against each other, which one would emerge victorious? Which Bug Tracking Tool rises above the other?

Be sure to let us know in the comments below!


#TestingChatter: Your Must-Have Testing Tools

Tools_clipartIn this week’s #TestingChatter challenge, we want to know what the uTest Community’s must-have testing tools are.

We’re talking tools that if for some reason you were on a deserted island that conveniently had Wi-fi or cell coverage…and your phone battery only had limited time to download a couple of tools, these would be the ones you’d gravitate to. Extremely hypothetical, I know, but you see where I’m going with this. We want to know which tools are in your must-have testing kit. The ones you simply couldn’t live without to get…stuff…done.

Tweet your must-have testing tools on Twitter using the hashtag #TestingChatter and we’ll be publishing YOUR tweets and favorite testing tools on the uTest Blog! If you notice that your favorite tools also aren’t in our Tool Reviews, be sure to add yours today to let your peers know all about them.

Web Debugging Proxy Tool Showdown: Charles vs. Fiddler

Web debugging proxy tools are used by developers and testers alike in areas such as capturing HTTP traffic between computer and the Internet, and especially in performance testing to find where site performance bottlenecks are occurring.

Charles Web Debugging Proxy and Fiddler are two well-known tools in this realm, Charles being a paid option, and Fiddler being a free product.

Many developers and testers across the Interwebs have praised Fiddler’s free and “open” nature, specifically the ability to add custom rules to modify requests and responses on the fly. However, based on the scarce data we have for these two tools in our Tool Reviews, it’s pretty hard to draw any firm conclusions from our own tester base on which is best in a head-to-head matchup. So we must ask the question: Who wins the web debugging proxy tool showdown: Fiddler or Charles?

Be sure to sound off in the comments below, and/or leave a review of these tools over at Tool Reviews to spread the good (or bad) word to your fellow testers.

Charles Web Debugging Proxy VSFiddler